| fox@fury | ||||
|
Friday, Jul 17, 2009 @ 4:13pm
Update: See the end of the article for Jeff Bezos’s admirably forthright response In light of Amazon reaching in to users Kindles and removing their legally purchased copies of 1984 and Animal Farm, the question must arise: Is it legal? A quick visit to the Amazon Kindle License Agreement leads me to believe that nothing in it gives Amazon the right to unilaterally revoke the license assignment without cause. The relevant passage concerning license rights given to the consumer reads:
Not being a lawyer, I don’t know whether an email notification and a credit to their account counts as ‘expressly provided by Amazon’ or whether it has to be provided in this license agreement. The tone of the paragraph seems to make it clear though that the assignments of the rights described here are permanent, and are made in trade for your payment. In other words, you bought the rights stated, limited as they may be. On the subject of subscriptions, Amazon has a clear policy of pro-rated refunds for subscriptions that are paid for but cannot be fulfilled (for example, if a magazine ceases publication):
But even in this case, there’s nothing that implies Amazon has the right to touch the portions of the subscription that you have already downloaded. And books aren’t subscriptions. Amazon also makes a clear distinction between the “Device” (the Kindle) and the “Service” (the content delivery mechanism):
This is important because the agreement makes clear that the Service could go away at any time, and you’re not entitled to it:
This would be as if you turned off the wireless switch on your Kindle forever. No more updates, no more downloads, but anything on your Kindle would stay. But what if you violate the terms of the agreement?
First, it’s clear that Amazon can only enforce this clause if you the customer are in breach of one or more terms of the agreement. If you are, Amazon insists that you stop using the software on your device (the Kindle OS or your iPhone Kindle app) and they may not only revoke your access to the Service but also to the Digital Content as well, presumably by reaching in to your Device and de-authorizing a key. This is clearly not what happened to purchasers of Orwell’s books, since there’s no allegation that they violated the usage agreement in any way. So what in the agreement allows Amazon to cancel the agreement unilaterally? There’s the standard amendment clause, which lets Amazon amend the agreement as it sees fit:
With this clause, Amazon could give themselves the right to take books away, but they would have to amend this agreement in order to do so, and the user would have to then use the Device and Software to give implicit agreement to the amendment. Set aside for a moment the conundrum of an agreement method that effectively says “If you try to read the book, you agree to our right to take it away, and if you don’t try to read it then you can keep it.” The fact is that if Amazon plans on amending their agreement to allow this, they haven’t done it at the time of this article. I freely admit that I’m a layman and not a student of law, so if someone more well versed than I can see what I missed, please let me know so I can update this post. Until then, always keep a backup of your book files on your computer or other media that is beyond Amazon’s grasp, so you can at least finish reading a book before Amazon takes it away or refuses to let you download it again (but that’s a whole other issue). Update: Jeff Bezos left an admirable response on the subject in the Kindle forums:
As far as I’m concerned, that’s that! If you like it, please share it.
|
Aboutme
Hi, I'm Kevin Fox. I also have a resume. recentWork
I'm currently starting a new thing. Stay tuned. Previously, I led followme
I post most frequently on Twitter as @kfury and on Google Plus. ©2012 Kevin Fox |
|||