fox@fury | |
Monday, Oct 28, 2002
Taking 'Dummies' a step further, they now have a book on that subset of the Dummies population that considers themselves a dummy amongst his peers, or a 'Dummy's Dummy' if you will.
At least, thats what I think of when I see Mp3 for Dummies (For Dummies). Heck, they even lowercased the p in MP3, and capitalized the second For. Still, things could be worse... (from the same publisher, I have to point out the hilarious Data Structures & Algorithm Analysis in Java by Sarah Michelle Geller. I want that book. I bet the exercises would be more fun, though I'd probably get annoyed every third page when she says "and this part had lots of gnar, so I asked Willow to do it." Sunday, Oct 27, 2002
So by now you've all hopefully remembered to set your clocks back an hour. For me personally, the change was a subtle reminder of how ubiquitous computing is marching ever-forward. I've just counted, and I have fifteen timepieces in my life. Of those, four automatically changed time to adjust for the end of Daylight Savings.
I was a little surprised by some. Here's how they fared:
As for my body, I put a little effort into trying to even out my sleep schedule. It's now 1:15am local time, and I'm going to sleep. Considering that I usually go to sleep around 3:15am, I'm compensating an extra hour, turning in an hour earlier than my biology expects. I hope everyone else's weekend was good. I've got a few bits to write up in the morning, probably before most of you even wake up from your Monday Bonus Hour of sleep. Sunday, Oct 27, 2002
Things not to do, item 1505:
Don't go see the midnight showing of The Ring and then drive home alone to park in front of your private cemetery, climb up to your solitary attic and go to sleep. Unless, of course, you're me. Saturday, Oct 26, 2002
Reading an article hypothesizing on the source of G W Bush's polar nature, I got to thinking...
When does partisanship give way to objectivity? Or does it ever? It's interesting to me that my own personal historical opinion of past presidents is only clouded by partisanship as far back as I was consciously aware of their term of office. I hold my own opinions of Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush the Sequel because I lived through them. Farther back than that though, I gauge a president's effectiveness based on what history thought, and that history, found in the textbooks mostly, usually speaks with one voice, with both the right and left channels mixed into monophonic. Where does that national consensus come from? Who decides, in the end, whether our children and grandchildren see GWB as a great leader or bully dullard? At the end of a presidency, do we all take a deep breath and say "okay, now that it's a moot point, yeah, he was really bad. Thank god there's this new guy" or will Republicans stand behind him even after there are more intelligent and worthy leaders at the point of the GOP's blade? As an example, I'd probably have supported Carter 100% against Reagan in 1980, but now I'd freely admit that his talents didn't particularly lie in his presidential acumen. Is this polarization inherent in a two-party system mirroring the 'with us or against us' polarization we fear so much in our sitting president? Wednesday, Oct 23, 2002
So the newest web toy on the block is Googlism.
The site takes the name of a person, place, thing, etc, and will throw back an impressively long list of definitions garnered from the web. Not definitive definitions mind you, but a list of phrases that begin (in my own egotistical example) 'Kevin Fox is a...'. The output is really impressive, as you'll no doubt see. I'm still sifting through, but the one that caught my eye was "Kevin Fox is my soulmate." Sadly I don't play the cello, and dimes'll give you dollars that she's lusting after my nomesis, musician and creator of the "Six Degrees of Kevin Fox". Nevertheless, here's my complete list. I've put links on the ones that I recognize as referring to me: kevin fox is a cellist and guitar player residing in toronto Of course, I don't know about a lot of the remaining items, but I'll be spending a little time on Google searching for the phrases to find out. It's like referrer-checking (aka backlinking) but on a linguistic, not a linky, level. So what are you? Wednesday, Oct 23, 2002
I think I used to work for these guys...
(note to previous employers reading this blog: I don't mean you. I mean that company two jobs before I worked for you. You know, the one that, while it didn't get me the job with you, increased my résume-cred enough to warrant that phone screen interview...) (note to everyone else: I can't believe a pap post like this is Fury's grand 1500th post. Ah well, happy cognitive reference point to me!) Tuesday, Oct 22, 2002
Spoiler Warning: If you haven't seen this week's Buffy and plan to, then read no further!
Okay, now for the rest of you... If you did watch Buffy, and you enjoyed it as much as I did, (and there really was so much to enjoy this week!) and you were geek enough to download the Once More With Feeling mp3s floating around last November, and buy the OMWF Soundtrack this month, then you're probably lusting for Selfless's two OMWF bonus tracks. You know I think too much, and I don't really know how Joss would feel about posting the MP3s but, since the're taken straight off the airwave broadcast, hopefully UPN and Mutant Enemy won't mind too much (note to Joss: Look how much I love your work). Just promise that, if and when these tracks are available commercially, you'll buy the album, just like we all bought OMWF when it came out. Oh, and if you want to link to these files, please link to this post, instead of directly to the files. Monday, Oct 21, 2002
Okay, I know I put Strongbad's Email in the meme-o-matic over a month ago, but for some reason I just find today's weekly installment so, so funny, it's worth a mention. [flash]
Monday, Oct 21, 2002
So Manchester, UK was "rocked" by a 3.2 temblor this morning, and later was hit by two larger earthquakes which, at this time, don't have Richters attached to them yet.
The funny bit is that everyone seems so surprised that there could be a larger quake after the first. The term 'foreshock' apparently hasn't crossed the pond, and even experts at the British Geological Survey seemed a bit surprised:
In truth, foreshocks are really common, and in the event of a 4.0 or higher, the USGS will usually put out a warning that there's a 20% chance of a quake larger than the first within the next 48 hours. Okay, okay, so maybe I'm just being picky. I just get a kick out of how the BBC put "bigger earthquake" in quotes. Monday, Oct 21, 2002
I only wish I was making this up, or that it was in The Onion... Apparently, swayed by Johnny Cochran's statement that he's "90% sure" that OJ is innocent of the murder of his ex-wife and her lover, the seeds of doubt have been planted in OJ's own fertile mind.
« Newer Posts
Older Posts »
When asked about his unrelenting manhunt for the 'real killers,' OJ revealed,If it turns out that Im actually the one who did it, then looking for the real killers would be a big old waste of time. Sounds like someone needs to make a call to the Psychic Friends Network to get this thing settled once and for all. Then maybe we'll learn the truth; that the whole thing: murder, flight from prosection, and neverending trials, was just a test balloon being raised by the folks at Fox to see whether the world was ready for reality TV. It looks like we were, and still are... |
aboutme
Hi, I'm Kevin Fox. I also have a resume. electricimp
I'm co-founder in The Imp is a computer and wi-fi connection smaller and cheaper than a memory card. We're also hiring. followme
I post most frequently on Twitter as @kfury and on Google Plus. pastwork
I've led design at Mozilla Labs, designed Gmail 1.0, Google Reader 2.0, FriendFeed, and a few special projects at Facebook. ©2012 Kevin Fox |